It includes downloadable SuiteScript samples, and hundreds of index entries to put all the tips, tricks and snippets at your fingertips. By the author of "Thinking in Java," covering version 8 of the Java programming language with updates to Java However, I assume you are able to figure things out. All rights reserved.
Share this book Feedback Email the Author s. David West Are you building the right thing? Do Well. Do Good. Learn more about writing on Leanpub.
Free Updates. DRM Free. Write and Publish on Leanpub You can use Leanpub to easily write, publish and sell in-progress and completed ebooks and online courses! Top Books 1. A complete foundation for Statistics, also serving as a foundation for Data Science.
More resources: openintro. Griglia risposte vuote per esercitazioni e correttore ministeriale Commento alla risposta con link alla fonte per facilitare lo studio. Buy early, pay less, free updates. This book teaches you how to make machine learning models more interpretable.
Bruce Eckel and Svetlana Isakova. Alien Torres and Matt Dahse. Top Bundles 1. This bundle contains a detailed and challenging collection of workbook labs, plus an extensively detailed technical reference guide. You'll learn:The essence of software architecture. Why the software architecture role should include coding, coaching and collaboration. Sure, it's kind of a trivial pattern if you look at it with from , but maybe 20 years ago people were structuring their codebases totally differently.
I wouldn't know. Maybe the ORMs were supposed to be "the domain" layer, but they're definitely not JUST what the author describes, as they contain both business and persistence logic.
So I can understand that there could be people who get value out of this, but I personally have not gained too much. You should also know that I was struggling really hard to write positive things about the book.
The bad: More bad stuff: The author prepares the stage a lot for concepts he'll eventually exemplify. A lot of times however, the code doesn't seem to prove his point too much.
He realises that, and ends sub-chapters with advice like "this is no silver bullet, you'll have to experiment for yourself, this problem rarely helps". That's fair as a disclaimer, but most of the time I found the concepts to be so vague and examples so useless that I wondered if really they were worth reading about. I'm sure a lot of intelligent people already realise that experimentation is useful, and situations tend to be unique.
It feels like he's not doing too much above "preaching to the choir". The ugly: 1. Developers I talked to say it's one of the ugliest pieces of software ever written. It's horrible to be a developer and work on that. The value of this book is highly arguable when you see someone literally urinating on top of all software architecture literature, and then being rewarded by the market for it.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. One of the many web frameworks which uses fewer layers than this book would suggest. You just get qualitative "this is a better way" comparison.
I'm getting the feeling that if the author would have honestly evaluated the advice he gave, this book wouldn't be nearly as famous.
As it is, I think he simply uses scare tactics, to frighten people into "architecting everything". I would have loved it to read things like: "In 2-people teams, working for 3 years on a project, you don't need any large scale architecture", "in a people team working for 10 years, you will find it highly desirable to use system metaphors", or "When the domain comprises less than 50 entities, you're fine to not use any patterns".
My remarks might be trivial, yes, but I don't think enough people realise the scale at which you have to begin fearing the software. This creates a large gap in the heads of beginners between theory and reality. I think even beginners should realise that if you want to travel 2 meters, you walk on foot, but if you need to travel 3k kilometers, you take the airplane. This information is missing, and I think authors might be purposefully over-selling their airplane-ideas, hurting the industry and enriching themselves - maybe I'm too paranoid, but there it is.
Would authors have an incentive to over-sell their skills? Should they address the conflict of interest? Did the author of this book address the issue? I do not recommend this book. Jan 29, David rated it it was amazing Shelves: software-development , non-fiction , i-have.
Been reading this on and off for a while now. I would put this on the "must read" shelf of anyone involved in the development side of software engineering, including programmers, designers, architects, even development managers.
It presents a lot of important points and topics that some developers sort of know or understand but never clearly defined and put forth. There are best practices on patterns, approaches to design and development, architecture, and communication. It takes OO development u Been reading this on and off for a while now. It takes OO development up to a new level, expanding on the generic technical ideas into the realm of domain knowledge.
It's about closing the gap of understanding between business users, project owners, and and the developers. The concepts presented take some time to absorb and are best learned when put in actual practice. It's not easy to digest but as you glean bits and pieces there, sometimes it's like, "I know doing this way always felt right", and now the book explains why it felt right. Some of the explanations are rather abstract there are very specific examples throughout the book for things that are hard to define, so I'd say I found it difficult to relate to things where I had no practical experience.
Still, I come away from this book with a good understanding of the benefits of placing high importance on the correctness and representational value of domain model. Excellent software engineering book. It presents a working strategy for writing and organizing software code in classes and packages in a clean and usable environment.
The book presents a "common language" concept that improves communication between team members and between the team and stake holders.
It presents strategies for managing code by associating class names and packages with specific functionalities, proving and common understanding of what-goes-where for a team working with domain dr Excellent software engineering book. It presents strategies for managing code by associating class names and packages with specific functionalities, proving and common understanding of what-goes-where for a team working with domain driven design DDD.
We have been working with DDD in our team increasingly over the last 6 months. Together with Domain-Driven Design Quickly which we use as our quick guide the book by Eric Evans provides excellent value for us.
By helping us with create a common understanding of what different concepts, like service, model, value object etc, means to our team, we can make our code a lot better organized. By incorporating concepts from the DDD book, for example stateless services, domain objects and root aggregates we improve our code quality as well.
Initially I decided not to write a review since I found a bunch of people who shared my impressions of the book and whose reviews put those impressions to words in a far more eloquent and analytical manner than I ever could but in the end it feels a shame not to say anything.
All in all, DDD was in many ways a great read, worthy of its highly lauded cult status - the ideas it presented, especially at the time of its writing, were almost groundbreaking. To top it off, the methodology it proposes s Initially I decided not to write a review since I found a bunch of people who shared my impressions of the book and whose reviews put those impressions to words in a far more eloquent and analytical manner than I ever could but in the end it feels a shame not to say anything.
To top it off, the methodology it proposes seems as valid as ever so in that regard it's aged quite well or our profession hasn't matured enough or maybe a bit of both. Where it hasn't aged so well is the writing. At times it felt so dry and abstract and repetitive that I had to re-read whole paragraphs when the examples section came around because I've forgotten what the examples were about to demonstrate.
I also quickly learned not to bother if I wasn't at the top of my game concentration-wise. While DDD is definitely a complex topic, it definitely isn't more complex than others I've read about but it certainly felt so You'll excuse the lack of potatoes though. Dec 28, Erika RS rated it really liked it Shelves: owned , software , physical. See elsewhere for my more detailed summary.
The short summary is that Domain-Driven Design is a great book for any programmer or software designer who wants to deepen their ability to model application domains. Evans describes why domain modelling is important and sets out a number of patterns for achieving better models. He has a good grasp of real world complexities and, because of that, insists that a model must be implementable if it is to be successful.
Any overlap between the model and the See elsewhere for my more detailed summary. Any overlap between the model and the implementation should be identical or the model will become obsolete. Evans provides a number of patterns to help determine the best domain model for an application. These patterns range from the abstract to the concrete, from the brilliant to the pedantic. Overall, I highly enjoyed the book although, at just over pages, I am glad that I had a reading group to work through it with.
Dec 16, Maciej rated it liked it Shelves: computer-science. A lot of the concepts from this book should be obvious to an experienced software developer. Despite this, it was an important read.
The book is too lengthy, so I scanned it from time to time. I also supported my reading with browsing the ideas from the book on the internet. May 11, Jose Seco Sanz rated it really liked it Shelves: uploaded , to-re-read , technical.
There is a lot of things to learn in here. Probably I should read it again. Oct 21, Rezaul Karim Sajib rated it really liked it Shelves: software-engineering. This book is the bible for the software engineers.
It' clearly changes the thinking perspective of every software engineer. Even though it is a "must read"book for developers who are willing to implement the domain driven design in their application, but in my opinion, others can also hugely benefitted from this book. I cannot give full 5 stars because this book can have more elaborated examples and it is hard to understand some of the concepts for less experienced developers. Nevertheless, I hi This book is the bible for the software engineers.
Nevertheless, I highly recommend every software engineer to read this book. Apr 17, Sergey Kislak rated it really liked it. Classic book on ddd Pattens and methods for the software architecture paradigm. Mar 30, Jolan rated it really liked it. The concepts are awesome but the book feels a bit outdated and hard to read.
Anyway for anyone interested, check out event storming, it really complements the DDD approach. Feb 20, Silviu Novitchi rated it really liked it. Contains plenty of real world examples on how the domain model design process should be done and who is involved. The main takeaway is that the domain is evolving through refactoring and deeper insights are discovered during the development lifecycle.
Jun 15, Vlad Ardelean rated it it was ok. Jun 28, Rafal Piekarski rated it really liked it Shelves: i-own. It took me more than a year to read this book. It was tough. This book is more like a directory of patterns and I believe that you shouldn't use all of them will every project.
I have heard before reading this book about many cases when implementing domain driven design failed. Especially in the Ruby world in which I write most of my daily code. But I believe the true reason of the failure was that people were trying to use all ideas from the DDD.
But the book written by Eric Evans in final chap It took me more than a year to read this book. But the book written by Eric Evans in final chapter emphasized that DDD is not a silver bullet and not every concept presented inside applies to your project and case. Nevertheless this book opens my eyes for role of ubiquitous language and importance of being on the same side with client.
So you shouldn't use DDD as an oracle for doing your next project. Because it's easy way to over-engineer things and I strongly believe that author was aware of it. In "conclusion" chapter he have written it couple of times. But stay sceptic. And focus on your project and client needs instead of surfing on every new buzzword you would find there. What I disliked was way this book was written. Language and sentences were hardly to read quick and I felt like crawling through each page instead of reading and going straight to using it in my projects.
I'm sure that this could be improved. Nov 16, Victor rated it really liked it Shelves: read-tech. Check out my blog for a more detailed review and summary of the book. This book is a must read. Although I read it from cover to cover, I think it is more useful as a reference book, going back to it to find answers for specific questions.
I think you need some practical experience and to have faced some of the problems this book is trying to solve in order to get the most out of it. Actually, it contains a lot of information that I wish I would h Check out my blog for a more detailed review and summary of the book. Actually, it contains a lot of information that I wish I would have known when I started out.
Real stories from his own experience help get the ideas across. I found the scenarios and stories really helpful. Abstract - Cited by 15 6 self - Add to MetaCart Model-driven approaches to software development, when coupled with a domain-specific visual language, assist in capturing the essence of a large system in a notation that is familiar to a domain expert. From a high-level domain-specific model, it is possible to concisely describe the configuration features that a system must possess, in addition to checking that the model preserves semantic properties of the domain.
With respect to large legacy applications written in disparate programming languages, the primary problem of transformation is the difficulty of adapting the legacy source to match the evolving features specified in the corresponding model.
This paper presents an approach for uniting model-integrated computing with a mature program transformation engine. The paper describes a technique for performing widespread adaptations of source code from transformation rules that are generated from a domain-specific modeling environment for a large avionics framework. Rest and linked data: a match made for domain driven development by David C.
At a first glance there might appear to be an obvious alignment and overlap between the approaches prescribed by REST and Linked Data. On more detailed inspection divergences in scope and applicability present themselves, and for some aspects, incompatibility. In this paper we investigate these simi In this paper we investigate these similarities and differences and suggest the coupling is worthy of a third look: in combination as a flexible environment in which the developer can focus on domain driven applications.
In Behavior Driven Development BDD , acceptance tests provide the starting point for the software design flow and serve as a basis for the communication between designers and stakeholders. In this agile software de-velopment technique, acceptance tests are written in natural language in o In this agile software de-velopment technique, acceptance tests are written in natural language in order to ensure a common understanding between all members of the project. As a consequence, mapping the sentences to actual source code is the first step of the design flow, which is usually done manually.
However, the scenarios described by the acceptance tests provide enough in-formation in order to automatize the extraction of both the structure of the implementation and the test cases. In this work, we propose an assisted flow for BDD where the user enters into a dialog with the computer which suggests code pieces extracted from the sentences. For this purpose, natural language processing techniques are exploited.
This allows for a semi-automatic transfor-mation from acceptance tests to source code stubs and thus provides a first step towards an automatization of BDD. Protocol Techn , Abstract: Service-Oriented Architectures SOA are a promising means to integrate heterogeneous systems, but virtually no technology-neutral approach to holistically understand SOAs exists.
We tackle this problem by introducing a survey of technology-independent patterns that are relevant for SOAs, We tackle this problem by introducing a survey of technology-independent patterns that are relevant for SOAs, and are working towards a formalised pattern-based reference architecture model to describe SOA concepts.
Software product lines are gaining importance because they allow improvements in time to market, cost, productivity and quality of software products. Architecture evaluation is one important aspect in the development of product lines for large-scale distributed systems. It is desirable to evaluate a Abstract - Cited by 6 3 self - Add to MetaCart Software product lines are gaining importance because they allow improvements in time to market, cost, productivity and quality of software products.
It is desirable to evaluate and compare architectures for functionality and quality attributes before implementing or changing the whole system. Often, the effort required for the thorough evaluation of alternatives using prototypes is prohibitive. In this paper, we present an approach for cost-efficient software architecture evaluation, based on scenario-oriented software specifications, modeling the system services. We show how to map the same set of services to several possible target architectures and give a procedure to generate evaluation prototypes using aspect-oriented programming techniques.
0コメント