Not sure why the results are so poor. I used the 1. Don't take this the wrong way, but I'm pretty sure a compact superzoom could produce sharper and brighter! OOC shots. The same 1. When I test a lens like this, the test shows me what the lens can do. When I pick up the camera and lens and start shooting, then I see what I can do. I'm a much bigger variable in the resulting image quality than the lens. I further suggest you compare 2 shots - a full frame image at mm with the TC, and another at without the TC, but with the camera in crop mode.
I suspect based on my 1. The crop mode image will be a 16 mp shot, which is considered enough by D4s users, so it's likely to be adequate here. Plus you can shoot at f5. This is the with the TC 1. All good suggestions [except the comment about a compact super-zoom ]. I'm here to learn. Thank you. Many of these shots have great compositions and color. Perhaps you can learn from them while you fix your lens or technique or both:. I have used the TC17 with my , particularly during a recent trip to Belize.
I got some decent results, but clearly there is a quality drop off compared to using the TCeiii. A lens with an effective f9. If you can even get it to focus the accuracy will not be good.
My suggestion is use the lens without tc's in the 1. For the front lighting you would have to increase the exposure because the animals are shaded. The cropped 1. I have found that for bird photography that around to mm is plenty.
To get a lot of pixels on a bird a person has to be closer even at mm. The tc 1. The farther a subject is the worse the images it will be. The newer tc 1. Saw you other photos and some subjects are under exposed. In this thread, photos even have a negative EV dialed in. From these photos you can see that the subjects are back-lit.
It appears you used matrix metering which would result in under exposure of the subjects. Trying to bring back the "correct" exposure in PP will increase grain and loss of detail. Messages: 4, Shoot the same subject with the f4 straight and with the 2X. Use a tripod to ensure best sharpness. Compare the results. I've used 3rd party 7 element 2X teleconverters in the past, some were quite good while others were junk. I have not used the one you have. It should be on the better side of converters.
Dec 7, 3. I was hoping someone would regale me with anecdotal stories of their experience with this teleconverter, but you are right Shutterfinger; testing is in order Dec 7, 4. Messages: 37, There are always some losses with teleconverters, but at that price, it is worth it. Dec 7, 5. Messages: 1, Very useful in landscape reach and decent sharpness stopped down. I've come to the conclusion that the Nikkor version of 2x doubler seemed to be better matched to the slower lenses.
Dec 7, 6. Dec 8, 7. Dec 8, 8. I've only gone out shooting twice with the 2x teleconverter attached to the f2. I am planning an Alaskan cruise Covid-permitting and was hoping the teleconverter set up would be a solution to lugging around the 5 pound We dig into the detail The Nikon Z mm F2.
With a versatile focal length range and a fast aperture for low light photography and blurry backgrounds, this lens promises sharp imagery and smooth bokeh with minimal aberrations. How does it actually perform?
Find out in our full review. If you're looking to speed up your editing workflow, few pieces of hardware can make complex masking, brushing and cloning jobs easier than a digital pen.
We look at Xencelabs' latest offering, the Pen Tablet Small. The Great Joy 60mm T2. Apple's flagship M1 Max MacBook Pro offers a combination of performance, efficiency, build quality, and screen quality that you cannot find in any PC on the market, full stop.
What's the best camera for shooting landscapes? High resolution, weather-sealed bodies and wide dynamic range are all important. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best.
If you're looking for the perfect drone for yourself, or to gift someone special, we've gone through all of the options and selected our favorites. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both speed and focus for capturing fast action and offer professional-level image quality. Although a lot of people only upload images to Instagram from their smartphones, the app is much more than just a mobile photography platform. In this guide we've chosen a selection of cameras that make it easy to shoot compelling lifestyle images, ideal for sharing on social media.
Submit a News Tip! Reading mode: Light Dark. Astrophotography Rig 2 by David Valencic. Ant Portrait by cyberastrofolkie. Reddy For Anything by cyberastrofolkie. Pesach by Noel Treacy. Ilford Delta Pro stand development by Modular. A good method to domesticate this bitchy film seems to be pure stand development.
That was my first stand development and I'm really pleased with the results! Camera: Nikon F lens: Micro Nikkor 55 Margaret by Noel Treacy. Angus and Margaret by Noel Treacy. Fly Face Test Shot by cyberastrofolkie. Experimental Macro by cyberastrofolkie. More or less left to right. The Face Of A Dragon by cyberastrofolkie. Coming Close For The Jelly by cyberastrofolkie.
Coruja-buraqueira Athene cunicularia. Squirrel by Lucas Dul. Nikon F3 Kodak color plus Nikkor mm f4. Sharing is caring by Lucas Dul. Moon by GPG Nikon AF mm f2. Nikon Teleconverters by Narsuitus. Nikon TC A 2x automatic diaphragm teleconverter designed to work with manual focus AI lenses up to mm in focal length.
Nikon TC A 2x automatic diaphragm teleconverter designed to work with manual focus AI lenses with mm and over focal lengths. Daisy White by ski 9. Moon on 35mm film by Lucas Dul. Both are old and both were designed for manual focus lenses. Moon on 5 September by Jack Swinden. This image is full cropped from the original photo. Venus and Jupiter on June 30, by A Nartist.
0コメント